Building the committee structure that makes retirement plan decisions defensible — charters, membership, cadence, and minutes that hold up.
No law requires a committee, but a formally established retirement plan committee is the recognized best practice — it names who holds fiduciary authority, creates a documented decision process, and shields employees who aren't members from inadvertent fiduciary status.
Read the full answerThe charter should establish the committee's authority by formal delegation, define membership and appointment rules, set meeting frequency and quorum, require minutes, and authorize hiring advisers. It's the document that makes the committee's fiduciary role — and its protection — official.
Read the full answerQuarterly meetings are the prevailing standard for retirement plan committees, matching the cadence of investment reporting. At minimum, meet semi-annually — and always document each meeting with minutes covering attendees, materials reviewed, decisions made, and the reasoning behind them.
Read the full answerMinutes should record attendees, materials reviewed, topics discussed, decisions reached, and the reasoning — enough that a stranger could reconstruct the prudent process years later. They should be factual and concise, approved at the next meeting, and retained with plan records.
Read the full answerERISA judges fiduciaries on the prudence of their process at the time of decision — and documentation is the only durable proof that process happened. Charters, minutes, adviser reports, and training records convert good governance into admissible evidence.
Read the full answerPut these answers to work
Fiduciary In A Box walks your team through every one of these requirements step by step — documenting decisions, organizing files, and keeping your plan compliant year-round.
See how FIAB works